![]() 03/06/2016 at 19:24 • Filed to: Airacobra, bell, P-39, planelopnik | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() 03/06/2016 at 19:29 |
|
I’ll just get this out of the way.
![]() 03/06/2016 at 19:31 |
|
![]() 03/06/2016 at 19:35 |
|
From the Central Texas Air Show in 2010, before I learned how to take pictures.
![]() 03/06/2016 at 19:36 |
|
Another example of rear-engine, front-wheel-drive that never caught on.
![]() 03/06/2016 at 19:36 |
|
Here we see the wild Airacobra in its natural habitat:
![]() 03/06/2016 at 19:47 |
|
Bloody hell. I had no idea any were airworthy...
![]() 03/06/2016 at 19:48 |
|
Deadly down low.
http://www.airspacemag.com/military-aviat…
![]() 03/06/2016 at 19:51 |
|
The first A-10 (in that it’s designed around a weapon platform). When I toured the Museum of the Great Patriotic War in Moscow a few years back, I spent a good few minutes staring at the P-63 on exhibit. (Terrible condition, but still great to see.)
Edit: See here - http://pobeda.poklonnayagora.ru/description/22…
![]() 03/06/2016 at 19:55 |
|
Lieutenant Baranovsky’s Airacobra
![]() 03/06/2016 at 19:58 |
|
But this motherfucking plane is a motherfucking snake.
![]() 03/06/2016 at 20:00 |
|
Never caught on? Bell made 9,588 of them. And about half of those were sent to Russia. The Russkies loved ‘em. Five of the 10 highest scoring Soviets aces logged the majority of their kills in P-39s.
![]() 03/06/2016 at 20:07 |
|
I missed this. My subscription has run out. Thanks.
![]() 03/06/2016 at 20:08 |
|
Now, that is a photograph. One of these days, I’m going to get out to the CAF air show in Midland. It’s a long drive, though.
![]() 03/06/2016 at 20:11 |
|
ForSweden has a nice on up top.
![]() 03/06/2016 at 20:12 |
|
Never caught on, as in “we never saw that silly layout again.”
Like these guys: http://jalopnik.com/this-chart-sho…
I actually loved that thing when I was a kid. It was mid-engined like a Ferrari, had a big cannon like a Warthog, tricycle gear, and windows like the General Lee
![]() 03/06/2016 at 20:17 |
|
That picture immediately reminded me of this .
![]() 03/06/2016 at 20:19 |
|
Better light in your photo, though. And framed against that big cumulus cloud. And the pilot’s face.
![]() 03/06/2016 at 20:24 |
|
Not a single driveshaft failure.
![]() 03/06/2016 at 22:48 |
|
Chuck Yeager said in his book that he’d gladly have gone to war in a P-39. The Russians loved it for it’s tank busting ability with that cannon in the nose, a great ground attack aircraft.
![]() 03/06/2016 at 23:28 |
|
Second only to the P-38 amongst Army Air Corps single seaters for me, and third behind the Corsair amongst US single seaters. The Soviets made very good use of them on the Eastern Front. Unfortunately the P-47 had largely replaced them in US service by Normandy in the ground support role.
![]() 03/07/2016 at 12:29 |
|
Pun you need to appreesh:
http://oppositelock.kinja.com/looks-like-he-…
![]() 03/07/2016 at 12:30 |
|
Unenclosed? So you could get your bootlaces wrapped around it?
![]() 03/07/2016 at 13:24 |
|
That view doesn’t have the seat or the stick boot.
This render was the best I could find.
![]() 03/07/2016 at 13:34 |
|
You can kind of see it in Ttyymmnn’s shot below. Thanks for clarifying.